sit down, [son]

One of the most central issues within the [modern] church, that seems to pop up every now and then is the question:

Should women be allowed to preach?

Essentially, this question does not relate to the official platform of ‘preacher’ as it relates to pastor or whatever official title you’d like to slap on to the formal structure of [church] ministry. Rather, the question is this — are women supposed to publicly speak out about the Gospel?

One would think that, within the modern era, this question is finite, and also redundant. Yet, it’s something that constantly pops up in church discussions, social media, and feminist campaigns. Personally, I’m not an advocate for feminism. I’m an advocate for the Gospel, and that intrinsically implies equality. Perhaps we’ll have a discussion about this another time?

Part of the recent uproar was caused by criticism toward Christian Author, Beth Moore, and others who were told to ‘go home’.

Nijay Gupta recently wrote this brilliant commentary as Paul, in an open letter to the church:

An Open Letter from the Apostle Paul to John MacArthur Regarding Beth Moore

I think it’s important, when interpreting Scripture, to consider the context in which, and for which it was written. It is impossible to fully understand Scripture, especially in the New Testament where letters were written to specific churches [new Believers that were birthed out of the Apostolic mandate that followed the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2] without also considering these words from Hebrews 4:12:

“For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.”

Hebrews 4:12, KJV:

I am, by no means, a Theologist or a Bible Guru, but from what I read, and see, and understand, the Word — all of it — is relevant and active to the here and now.

When reading Scripture that is culturally-specific, I think it’s important to consider that culture is such a diverse notion. It’s not something that is easily defined, and it’s even harder to transfer. But, when interpreting Scripture, we should be wary to not fall back under legalism. Christ said that He didn’t come to abolish the Law [the Levitical Law of Moses, as found in the Torah], but to fulfil it. Therefore, under the New Covenant, we are governed by the Spirit, and not the Law.

Does this mean that Scripture is no longer relevant? Absolutely not! It does mean, however, that we should interpret Scripture and its cultural notions through the Holy Spirit. There is an argument to be made, of course, that this is very subjective, and again — let’s be careful not to enforce the opinion of man on Scripture and call it Gospel — but, Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Truth, and therefore is an agent on behalf of Man to intercede before the Father, and to reveal the will of God to the hearts and minds of Man.

Feminism aside, if you look at Scripture, you’ll find that, aside from the 12 disciples, there was a crowd of people who followed Jesus as he ministered. The vast majority were women.

Should women be allowed to preach? Absolutely.

Because the Great Commission, and the whole Scripture, is for Believers.

It’s not Elitist. It’s not meant for Scholars. It’s not culture-specific or culture-exclusive. It’s not language-specific. It’s not age-specific. it’s not race-specific. It’s not gender-specific.

Are you called to preach?

If you consider yourself to be a Believer — yes.

A minister of the Gospel is not a preacher, a bishop, a pastor a prophet — titles and job descriptions that [the church] has slapped on to formal structures to try and make sense of [the church]. Being a minister of the Gospel means to be like John 3:8 says, to be led by the Spirit, to be obedient to the whole Scripture, to preach the Good News of the Gospel, to be a witness to the Nations.

And if you happen to be a woman, does this disqualify you? No. I say — rise up and preach!


John, I appreciate the love you have for the Lord and the passion you have for the church. I know that you think that the world would be a better place if women did as they were told and “stayed home.” But I need to tell you that you are damaging my ministry with these notions. The great gospel mission cannot impact the world in the ways God has planned if you hold back the kingdom’s servants. “The fields are ripe and the work is great,” Jesus used to say. Women have played such a crucial role in my apostolic mission, I could not operate without their wisdom, partnership and leadership.

They can’t go home, there is simply too much at stake.

Euodia and Syntyche (Phillipians 4:2-3) can’t go home. Sometimes these women don’t get along, but they have been leaders in evangelism and outreach and have worked alongside me to fight for the faith. They have to journey beyond their doorsteps to do this work.

Junia can’t go home, John. Sorry, she is in prison (again) because of her work for the gospel out there in the world (Romans 16:7). In fact, the other apostles have some pretty amazing things to say about her ministry.

Phoebe can’t go home, John. She went to Rome—actually, I sent her there (Rom 16:1-2). I sent her with my letter to the Romans and also to provide ministry support there. 

It might provide a little comfort to you that I sent Nympha to her home in Lycus Valley (Colossians 4:15); not to do domestic duties (she has servants for that), but to be the house church leader and patroness. 

John, we must part with any sentimental or nostalgic notions of womanhood where women sweep and cook while the men do the “real work” of ministry. I wish you could meet with the women who contend alongside me as co-workers of the gospel mission: they are gifted, wise, and brave (when was the last time you were in prison?). 

John, I know you care about the gospel, and we can’t do the work with one hand tied behind our backs. The gospel of Jesus Christ is just too important. Let the Phoebes, Junias, Euodias, Syntyches, and Nymphas do their work—and you do yours too.

Grace to you, John, and let others also know you are a grace-filled believer as well (remember: grace is generosity mixed with love out of the compassion of Christ) 

Paul, slave of Jesus Christ

4 thoughts on “sit down, [son]

  1. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
    1 Timothy 2:12‭-‬13 ESV

    Paul’s reasoning isn’t cultural, but creational. Ever since we ate the fruit, men have abdicated responsibility and women have sought to usurp authority.

    In the context, of course Paul isn’t saying that women can’t share the gospel- no one’s saying that! He’s just saying that in the context of a church worship meeting, men are to do the teaching.
    Does the fact women are commanded to submit to male leadership make women lesser? No- does the fact the Son submits to the Father make Him lesser? No!

    Thanks for the post, God bless 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Robert! Thanks for sharing your opinion! I absolutely agree that ‘allowing women to preach’ or publicly speak, does not mean usurping authority — on the contrary. We are ALL commanded to submit to leadership.

      I do think, however, that we are often hesitant to take on ‘modern’ issues within the church for fear of stepping on religious toes, or trying to mould Scripture according to limited understanding or revelation.

      I think, especially within ‘the church’ we are prone to limit purpose to function, instead of the other way around.

      Going back to Genesis, I don’t see Eve created as Plan B — as if the Creator slipped up when He designed and planned Creation — but as an equivalent, a counter-part, and equal partner to Adam.

      Of course, gender-issues are very extensive within Scripture, but from what I understand, ManKIND was created as partner to God. Eve was made OUT OF Adam. The principle therefore is multiplication — a theme that repeats throughout Scripture — and not division.

      In the New Testament, especially in reference to the church of new believers, following the ministry of the Apostles, the author encourages illiterate women to ask questions relating to teaching to their own husbands in private capacity. The aim therefore, is not to ‘shut up and sit down’, but to keep them from public embarrassment. Bear in mind that, for most of the modern era following Christ’s ministry, women were not allowed to learn or read or study. Therefore, publicly revealing their lack of understanding would lead to criticism and ridicule among the scholarly community and the church. The man, as head of the household, is to fulfil the role and calling of prophet, priest, and king. And therefore, acts as teacher — especially — to his own family.

      Unfortunately, we tend to interpret ‘modern’ church through glasses of feminism and empowerment, rather than through glasses of the Holy Spirit.

      The issue is not whether women should be subject to men, but whether women are allowed to believe. Because, essentially, being a Believer also makes one a Witness. And being a Witness means that the Great Commission, and subsequently the entire Scripture is applicable to EVERY Believer. Regardless of gender, race, or age.

      Traditional church roles imply that one should be sent out by the church, as a missionary, a Sunday school teacher, a worship leader, a hospitality servant, an usher — but, from what I can tell, the only qualification one needs to be a minister, is to be born again by the Holy Spirit.


      1. I believe that Scripture doesn’t have to conform to culture, but culture should conform to Scripture. It might not be politically correct for women not to preach in church, but it’s Biblically correct. Just because men and women are equal doesn’t mean to say we’re clones with identical roles. Yes, we’re all to be witnesses for Christ, but we’re not all to preach in church.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Oh, absolutely — that’s the heart of Romans 12:2, is it not — to allow Holy Spirit to renew our thinking according to the culture of the Kingdom, and not the other way around? In no way do I think equality constitutes ‘similarity’ — especially in terms of ministry. Does Scripture not say that some were called to be Teachers, some Prophets etc etc? These are, of course, ‘official’ titles or job descriptions within the [church], but I think that one does not have to be ‘ordained’ in order to be a minister. That’s what I’m trying to convey by one being qualified based on the premise that one is a Believer. Of course, calling should determine function, and not function calling. Or, put differently, the Kingdom Commission should determine our purpose. Our individual giftings and ministry environments, if you will, determines how we live out that calling and commission.


Comments are closed.